By Chisom Agali, Texas Academy of Mathematics and Science, University of North Texas
Abstract
Humanity stands at a pivotal moment in space exploration: under the Artemis Program, the Moon is no longer merely a destination for symbolic landings, but a launching point for a sustainable cislunar economy. This paper examines how policy frameworks, international cooperation, and infrastructure development must converge to enable a viable lunar base and cislunar logistics network. Existing treaties, national legislation, and commercial programs are analyzed to identify technological, economic, and regulatory challenges. Finally, the paper offers practical policy recommendations and industry measures to transition from temporary footprints to lasting presence and commerce in cislunar space.
Introduction
The renewed global interest in the Moon, led by NASA’s Artemis program and a cadre of commercial actors, signals the rise of a new era: one in which the lunar surface and its surrounding cislunar space become operational areas for infrastructure, commerce, and strategic presence rather than mere exploration. The change from singular missions to sustained activity requires more than rockets and landers; it demands robust policy, governance, and business models aligned with infrastructure investments. This paper explores the intersections of these changes that will allow for a sustainable lunar economy. It first reviews the lunar environment and emerging economic opportunities, analyzes current governance regimes, examines infrastructure and industry needs, and finally proposes a roadmap for policy and industry collaboration to manifest a long-term presence.
Background: lunar environment & economic opportunity
The decades following the Apollo 17 mission marked a transition from achievement to strategic necessity. NASA’s Artemis program, designed to establish a permanent presence on and around the Moon, signals a shift toward a sustainable cislunar economy capable of supporting long-term habitation, resource utilization, and commercial growth. This discussion is particularly timely as global powers accelerate their lunar ambitions through initiatives such as NASA’s Artemis Accords and China’s International Lunar Research Station, marking a pivotal decade for shaping cislunar governance. Rapid technological progress, from reusable launch systems to commercial lunar payload services, has made a sustained lunar presence economically and logistically feasible for the first time.
The cislunar region, encompassing the space between Earth and the Moon and including the Earth-Moon Lagrange points, represents the next strategic frontier for communication and navigation. Establishing functional cislunar infrastructure—from communication constellations to refueling stations—will transform lunar resources into practical assets for deeper space missions.
The discovery of water ice within permanently shadowed regions at the lunar poles has redefined the Moon’s value, from a purely scientific destination to a potential resource hub for future operations and the production of life-supporting materials. Lunar regolith, rich in oxygen and metals, presents opportunities for in-situ resource utilization (ISRU), reducing dependence on Earth-based supply chains. Access to helium-3 and rare Earth metals could further the development of advanced technologies and fusion energy, while the lack of a significant atmosphere allows for high rates of solar energy accumulation to power these operations.
To exploit lunar resources effectively, a new class of infrastructure will be needed: communication networks, power grids, transport nodes, and refueling depots. For ice deposits and other limited resources, policies must establish frameworks for equitable access while preventing territorial disputes. Developing infrastructure around these sites will require coordination between international partners and private entities under clear governance principles. Without comprehensive policy frameworks, competition for lunar resources and orbital slots could replicate the challenges of terrestrial geopolitics.
While lunar development advances rapidly, policies and regulations remain fragmented. Originally drafted during the Cold War, existing treaties and national laws must now adapt to an era of commercial expansion and multinational collaboration.
Existing policy and international/regulatory frameworks
As a result of the space race and Cold War, the Outer Space Treaty (OST, 1967) was established to prevent the militarization of space. It serves as the foundational legal framework for the exploration and use of outer space and establishes core principles including the peaceful use of space, prohibition of national appropriation of celestial bodies, and promotion of scientific cooperation. By declaring outer space the “province of all mankind,” the OST prevents territorial claims on the Moon or other celestial bodies. Moreover, it prohibits the placement of nuclear or other weapons of mass destruction in orbit or on planetary surfaces, establishing a baseline for peaceful use.
While the OST has prevented territorial disputes and military conflicts, it offers limited guidance regarding commercial activity, resource extraction, and private actors. Private companies may participate in space activities but operate under the jurisdiction of their respective states, which are responsible for compliance. The treaty’s non-appropriation principle complicates ownership claims over extracted resources. Consequently, while the OST provides a critical foundation, it leaves gaps that require national legislation, multilateral agreements, or new frameworks to enable sustainable commercial activity.
To address these gaps, countries have implemented domestic legislation to support commercial space operations. The U.S. Commercial Space Launch Competitiveness Act (2015) encourages private investment by providing a predictable regulatory framework and recognizing rights to resources extracted in space. Other nations, such as Luxembourg, Japan, and the UAE, have also introduced laws and programs to facilitate commercial space development, reflecting a global trend toward space entrepreneurship. While national legislation enables private sector growth, it can create tensions with international frameworks, highlighting the need for coordination between domestic policies and international obligations.
In parallel, the Artemis Accords establish a multilateral framework to guide cooperative exploration and use of outer space. The Accords emphasize transparency, interoperability of infrastructure, sustainable resource management, and the creation of safety zones to prevent harmful interference. Adopted by 60 nations as of January 2026, they signal a growing international consensus on structured cooperation and shared standards.
Finally, national lunar strategies provide guidance for domestic programs and public-private partnerships. NASA’s Artemis program focuses on sustainable exploration, international collaboration, and commercial partnerships, including initiatives like the Commercial Lunar Payload Services (CLPS) program. ESA emphasizes robotics, technology development, and collaborative science projects, while CNSA pursues long-term lunar research and potential commercial activities. Japan, India, and Russia also maintain strategies defining exploration priorities and resource utilization goals. These national plans align with broader treaties and agreements but highlight the complexity of harmonizing international cooperation, shared resource access, and operational safety across legal and strategic frameworks.
Together, treaties, laws, accords, and strategies form a patchwork of guidance for lunar development. They provide a starting point for cooperation and regulation but reveal gaps that must be addressed to support sustainable commercial and scientific activities in cislunar space.
Policy Challenges & Opportunities
The rapid advance of lunar and cislunar activity brings challenges and opportunities across legal, economic, technical, and ethical domains. One major issue concerns property rights over lunar resources. Treaties like the OST prohibit national appropriation of celestial bodies but do not clearly address commercial extraction and ownership of materials (United Nations, 1967). This leaves companies and states uncertain: who owns mined ice or rare earth metals? Liability is another concern. If a private lander crashes or damages other infrastructure, who is responsible? Safety zones around sensitive sites or high-value resources are also under-defined, and rules for cislunar traffic are still being developed.
New business models are emerging, including lunar communications networks, refueling stations, transport hubs, and lunar manufacturing. ESA has projected hundreds of lunar missions in the coming decades, opening multiple market opportunities. Yet costs remain high, supply chains are fragile, and financing large-scale lunar projects is risky. Early movers who build logistics hubs or ISRU systems could gain significant advantages.
Cislunar traffic management is a growing concern. Studies suggest that even a limited number of satellites in lunar orbit could result in non-trivial collision risks (Georgia Institute of Technology, 2025). Politically, multiple nations and private actors operate with different priorities. Coordinating among them is vital to avoid duplication, interference, and geopolitical tension.
There is also the challenge of structuring governance frameworks that preserve incentives for risk-taking and investment while reducing the potential for conflict and exclusion.
Despite these challenges, opportunities exist. Clear regulations for property and liability could reduce commercial risk. Public-private partnerships can accelerate the development of lunar logistics. International coordination can improve safety and navigation standards. Policies encouraging fair access and sustainability can ensure long-term benefit for humanity.
In this context, sustainability refers to maintaining the long-term operability of lunar infrastructure and resource sites without imposing constraints that undermine economic viability or discourage private investment.
Case Studies
NASA’s Commercial Lunar Payload Services (CLPS) program contracts private companies to deliver payloads to the lunar surface. These missions enable surface science while laying the groundwork for infrastructure, demonstrating how public-private partnerships can create a demand-driven lunar logistics market. CLPS shows that private companies can be integrated into lunar exploration in ways that complement government efforts, reducing costs and accelerating deployment.
Private lunar landers, such as those developed by Intuitive Machines and Astrobotic Technology, are testing surface operations, resource delivery, and ISRU readiness. These missions serve as early examples of commercial lunar activity and help set standards for private operations. By demonstrating the technical feasibility of cargo delivery, they also provide valuable data for future business models and partnerships.
International collaboration adds another dimension. ESA has explored lunar communications, navigation, and other commercial use cases, focusing on interoperability and shared scientific goals. CNSA is pursuing long-term lunar infrastructure through initiatives like the International Lunar Research Station, combining government-led development with international partnerships. Other countries, including Japan, India, and Russia, have issued lunar strategies outlining their priorities for exploration, resource utilization, and technology development. These strategies shape how nations coordinate, compete, and collaborate in the emerging lunar economy.
Lunar development is no longer purely government-led. Private actors, international partners, and emerging business models are all shaping the landscape. They highlight the link between policy and infrastructure: clear regulation reduces business risk, while robust infrastructure ensures policy goals can be realized. The Moon is now a place for a new era of space commerce.
Recommendations
To enable a sustainable lunar economy, policy frameworks must provide clarity on resource rights.
Nations and companies require clearly defined access and property-rights frameworks to reduce uncertainty and prevent disputes. Within those frameworks, entities should retain flexibility in how resources are extracted, subject only to baseline safety and coordination standards appropriate to the lunar environment. Decisions regarding how harvested resources are ultimately used should remain with the extracting entity, as this autonomy is essential for economic viability and innovation.
Regulatory sandboxes could allow private companies to test new technologies, operations, and business models in controlled environments without immediately triggering complex international legal conflicts. International governance frameworks should coordinate these efforts, creating standards for shared resource zones, traffic management, and safety protocols to ensure long-term stability in cislunar space.
From an industry perspective, establishing logistics nodes in key lunar locations or in cislunar orbit could streamline operations and reduce dependence on repeated Earth launches. Such nodes could serve as refueling stations, storage depots, or transfer points for cargo and personnel, allowing for efficient movement of materials and resources. Sustainable infrastructure models should prioritize in-situ resource utilization, renewable energy sources such as solar arrays, and modular habitat designs that can expand over time. These approaches reduce costs and environmental impacts while supporting longer-term missions.
Public-private alignment will be crucial. Governments can provide incentives, contracts, or risk-sharing mechanisms that encourage private investment in infrastructure and technology development. Private companies can contribute innovation, efficiency, and operational expertise while adhering to international standards and national regulations. Together, coordinated policy and industry action can build a resilient lunar economy balancing commercial opportunity, scientific progress, and ethical stewardship
Conclusion
The Moon and cislunar space represent both a strategic opportunity and a complex challenge. Coordinated policy and infrastructure are essential to ensure lunar development is safe, sustainable, and beneficial for all stakeholders. Legal clarity, economic support, technical coordination, and ethical oversight must work together to avoid conflicts and maximize opportunity.
Looking forward, public-private partnerships, international governance frameworks, and sustainable infrastructure will define the success of lunar operations. As nations and companies expand their presence in cislunar space, careful planning today will set the foundation for decades of exploration, resource utilization, and economic growth. With clear policies and robust infrastructure, the Moon can evolve from a scientific frontier to a thriving platform for humanity’s continued expansion into space.
Works Cited
“Commercial Lunar Payload Services – NASA.” NASA, 5 Jan. 2024, www.nasa.gov/commercial-lunar-payload-services/#clps-overview. Accessed 2 Nov. 2025
Crawford, Ian A. “Lunar Resources.” Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment, vol. 39, no. 2, 8 Feb. 2015, pp. 137–167, https://doi.org/10.1177/03091333145675852025.
“Intuitive Machines Awarded Contract to Advance Lunar Logistics, Cargo, and Mobility Solutions | Intuitive Machines.” Intuitive Machines, 2025, investors.intuitivemachines.com/news-releases/news-release-details/intuitive-machines-awarded-contract-advance-lunar-logistics. Accessed 2 Nov. 2025.
“Lunar Economy Applications.” Esa.int, 2023, business.esa.int/funding/open-competition/lunar-economy-applications? Accessed 2 Nov. 2025.
“Lunar Exploration.” Lunarexploration.esa.int, lunarexploration.esa.int/explore/science
NASA. “Artemis – NASA.” NASA, 2024, www.nasa.gov/feature/artemis/.
Nations, United. “International Space Law Explained | United Nations.” United Nations, 2017, www.un.org/en/peace-and-security/international-space-law-explained. Accessed 2 Nov. 2025.
THE ARTEMIS ACCORDS PRINCIPLES for COOPERATION in the CIVIL EXPLORATION and USE of the MOON, MARS, COMETS, and ASTEROIDS for PEACEFUL PURPOSES. 13 Oct. 2020.
United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs. “The Outer Space Treaty.” UNOOSA, 1966, www.unoosa.org/oosa/en/ourwork/spacelaw/treaties/introouterspacetreaty.html.
Vedda, James. “Cislunar Development: What to Build and Why | Aerospace Center for Space Policy and Strategy.” Aerospace.org, 17 Apr. 2018, csps.aerospace.org/papers/cislunar-development-what-build-and-why. Accessed 2 Nov. 2025.
Wainscott-Sargent, Anne. “Georgia Tech Study Hopes to Prevent Cislunar Collisions as Moon Missions Increase | News Center.” Georgia Tech News Center, 2025, news.gatech.edu/news/2025/07/18/georgia-tech-study-hopes-prevent-cislunar-collisions-moon-missions-increase? Accessed 2 Nov. 2025.
White, Wayne N. “Property and Sovereignty in Space: Countries and Companies Face Potential Clashes as They Take to the Stars.” Space, 9 Mar. 2025, www.space.com/space-exploration/property-and-sovereignty-in-space-countries-and-companies-face-potential-clashes-as-they-take-to-the-stars? Accessed 2 Nov. 2025.